Category Archives: Resistance to injustice

Bill Moyers & the environment

Public understanding of science and the environment has been a major concern for some of the world’s leading journalists. This was especially true for publisher E.W. Scripps, CBS anchor Walter Cronkite, and documentary producer Bill Moyers (June 5, 1934 – June 26, 2025).

A White House press secretary under Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s, a CBS correspondent and PBS program producer since the 1960s, Moyers won every important award in television journalism, including a lifetime Emmy, for his innovative and thoughtful programs on public affairs.  Perhaps his best known was the PBS series “Joseph Campbell and the Power of Myth.”

Unfortunately, Moyers was not as well known for his views on the erosion of environmental science and public information in America. “Once the leader in cutting edge environmental policies and technologies and awareness, America is now eclipsed,” Moyers said in a 2005 speech.  “As the scientific evidence grows, pointing to a crisis, our country has become an impediment to action, not a leader.”

Moyers blamed unconventional and deceitful practices by environmentally unfriendly corporations who managed to influence behind-the-scenes decisions in newsrooms through legal threats and public relations campaigns. In an Oct. 1, 2005 keynote speech to the 2005 conference of the Society of Environmental Journalists, Moyers said:

“If the environmental movement is pronounced dead, it won’t be from self-inflicted wounds. We don’t blame slavery on the slaves, the Trail of Tears on the Cherokees, or the Srebrenica massacre on the bodies in the grave. No, the lethal threat to the environmental movement comes from the predatory power of money and the pathological enmity of rightwing ideology.” Text of Moyers’ speech is available here.      

Audio of the speech is available here.

Moyers & Company reports on environment and climate change are available here.

Continue reading

Social instability and the media

Ezra Klein’s Feb. 25  New York Times interview with Martin Gurri is a fascinating and troubling hour-long ramble through the wreckage of McLuhanism and aging concepts about chaotic information systems.

The highlight is a temporal excursion into the Thirty Years War and the role of the printing press. The low point is a defense of right-wing free speech absolutism that should have been better informed.

Gurri’s book,  “The Revolt of the Public,” argues that the new abundance of unfiltered, non-hierarchical information creates a fractured media system that is fundamentally unstable.  “It knows how to destroy but not how to build,” as Klein says.

This is not a new idea. Jay Bolter’s 2018 book,  The Digital Plenitude, made the same argument about the instability inherent in the erosion of authoritative information. So did Marshall McLuhan in the 1960s, although McLuhan approached it from the other side, more or less cheering the erosion of straight-jacketed cultural institutions.

What’s different about Gurri’s book is that he connects this information instability to the rise of authoritarianism in the US with the re-election of Donald Trump.  And he has this to say about the role of revolutionary media using a time machine metaphor :  Continue reading

Fact checking Holocaust disinformation

This is an example of just how far right-wing disinformation will go. According to the narration in this video:  “The Holocaust stuff was about them (the New York Times)  not wanting to be seen as a Jewish-owned  newspaper, because this was America in the 1940s, there was a lot of antisemitism. They were afraid it would jeopardize their position in the market, and for them, that was just something they would not sacrifice, even for the truth. They actually forbade the word “Jew” in their news reports during that period.”  

That seemed pretty far fetched on the face of it, so we fact-checked the claim that the word “Jew” could not show up in the New York Times. Using the full text ProQuest database to search of the Times for the words  “Jews or Jewish” in the date range 1933 – 1946, we found 95,085 articles over 5114 days (14 years), for an average of  18.6  articles mentioning Jews or Jewish people  per day.

There are over 3,500 articles with the term “concentration camp,” and of those, over 750 also have the words “Jews or Jewish.”

The Prager U media “expert” also says that the New York Times w0n Pulitzer prizes during World War II for pro-Nazi coverage.  Checking the roster of Pulitzers from 1942 through 1946, there are no prizes for the Times coverage of the European war. There are two for  Pacific war coverage, and one in 1941 for general coverage of the emerging war. There are none for anything remotely resembling “pro-Nazi” coverage.

This Prager video fits with the right-wing canard that political progressives in the US are antisemitic, but unfortunately, it doesn’t fit the facts.

As an interesting side – note:  The New York Times did win a Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 1944 in honor of its April 4, 1943 survey about understanding of US history.   We wonder how well the Prager staff would fare on that kind of history test.

Also See: 
American Public Opinion and the Holocaust (Gallup polls)

Black history month 2023

Ida B. Wells

February is traditionally black history month, and it’s time to recall that one of the most  significant moments in the history of the American press involves the long, ongoing struggle for civil rights in the Black press and the resistance from  the White / mainstream press against civil rights, which only gradually changed in the post World War II era.

There are two stories. Part I is the story of the African American / Black press —  the  mainstay of the long movement for equality.  Part II is the story of  the White / mainstream press reluctantly awakening to its responsibilities.   

The Black press “was the signal corps,” wrote Margot Lee Shetterly, author of  Hidden Figures, “giving the watchword so that the negro community moved forward in synch with America.”    

Read more: “Civil Rights and the Press” here, at Revolutions in Communication.

A modern Pulitzer & a 19th century editor

The 2021 Pulitzer Prize for commentary and editorial writing, won by Richmond Times Dispatch columnist Michael Paul Williams,  begins by noting that there were objections to the massive statues of Robert E Lee and other Confederate heroes erected in the 1890s in the former capitol of the Confederacy.
Williams wrote:

The original opponent of the Robert E. Lee statue issued a stern prophesy after the monument was erected in 1890.  John Mitchell Jr. — newspaper editor, politician, banker and civil rights activist — predicted that the monument “will ultimately result in handing down to generations unborn a legacy of treason and blood.”  

John Mitchell, Jr., was editor of the Richmond Planet from 1884 – 1925.   A resident of Richmond, Va.’s  Jackson Ward area, Mitchell was born into slavery in 1863, but his family was freed when Union troops liberated the city in April 1865.

Beginning in December, 1884, Mitchell started reporting on injustice and lynchings. For example, he reported on a lynching in Smithville,  Charlotte county, Virginia in May, 1886. Afterwards, someone sent Mitchell a rope with a note attached to it, warning that he would also be lynched if he ever set foot in Smithville. He responded with a line from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar:

“There are no terrors, Cassius, in your threats, for I am so strong in honesty that they pass by me like the idle wind, which I respect not.”

Afterwards, armed with two Smith & Wesson pistols, Michell took a train to   Smithville and walked  five miles from the station to see the site of the hanging.

Continue reading