Category Archives: Features

The allure of new technology …

In 1906, wireless telegraphy was all the rage, and predictions were that soon people would be wearing antennae on their hats and receiving Morse code messages on ticker-tape.

One remarkable thing here is the idea that technology would separate people, rather than bringing them together, which is the usual hope found in the rhetoric of the technological sublime.

See Retro-future of Communications on this site.

AI sidelines Sports Illustrated

By Bill Kovarik
Jan 26, 2024

Sports Illustrated — once the beloved icon of sports news and photography — has been sidelined for financial irregularities and technical fouls. It probably won’t be back.

The fouls involved articles scraped up through artificial intelligence bots – an ethical lapse which came to light in November, 2023. Worse, the magazine tried to cover it up with AI portraits of the supposed authors. The ruse was quickly spotted and the editor was fired.

As advertisers began pulling out, the remaining editors and management faced increasing financial trouble. Then, on Jan. 5, 2024,  Sports Illustrated defaulted on regular quarterly payment to its owners, Authentic Brands Group. Two weeks later, ABG terminated the licensing agreement and laid off most of the reporting staff.

So, let’s pause for a moment of silent reflection, in recognition that another great institution is passing us by, headed for the intellectual property bone yards, where its icons will be recycled to brand products like designer swimsuits and tennis shoes.

Sports Illustrated was founded in 1954 by Henry Luce of the Time-Life group to compete with two of the major sports magazines of the time — Sport (founded 1946) and the venerable Sporting News (founded 1886). Back then, people thought Luce was crazy to invest in a “jockstrap” magazine, but his timing was good.

Back then, Illustrated magazines were filling the consumer demand for high quality visual experiences while the dominant media — radio and early television — offered audiences only low visual definition. Sports Illustrated also presented better quality journalism and photography than was possible in daily newspapers at the time, and Luce managed to keep all his magazines a step ahead of the competition.

In the 1950s and 60s — a time when politics was America’s most dangerous occupation — Sports Illustrated occupied center field by raising the tone of sports news. Along with sports that were already well covered, like boxing and baseball, Sports Illustrated opened the fields of tennis, golf, football and basketball to greater public participation.

Some of its editorial innovations are still well known, such as the athlete of the year and the annual swimsuit issue. Making the cover of Sports Illustrated was, for an athlete, a lot like a Nobel Prize for a scientist.

However, by the end of the twentieth century, the business of magazine and newspaper publishing fractured under competitive pressures from cable, streaming and internet publications. Advertising and circulation declined, and so did Sports Illustrated, despite valiant attempts to save it.

The magazine was sold during the Time-Warner breakup in 2018 and, after changing hands, was picked up by Authentic Brands Group, which specializes innfranchises like Reebok shoes, clothing brands like Juicy Couture, and commercial celebrity names like Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe.

ABG will profit from the Sports Illustrated photo archives and the famous swimsuit editions, if nothing else. But the chances that Sports Illustrated will return from the elephant graveyard of news magazines are probably about the same as those of Sport (d. 2000), Sporting News (d. 2012), or for that matter, general photo magazines like Look (d. 1971) or Life (d. 20 00).

Its not only that the genre is no longer profitable, or that if you want to make a small fortune in publishing, you have to start with a big one.

No.

It’s that the world has moved on. Deadspin, theAthletic, network media like ESPN, and media from individual franchises and conferences have all taken center field now. Magazines of all kinds are long gone.

One reason why all this matters more than, say, shifts in seasonal produce or fashions in furniture, is that print journalism was a quality element in a bundle of services that have come unglued.

Thoughtful writing and brilliant photography no longer have solid financial support from middle America.  Magazines like Sports Illustrated were lost on the amusement park midway and drained of life by the digital-industrial information complex.

There is no fixing the loss of magazines, but there are ways to rebuild the media. Repealing Section 230 would be a start in the US.  Adopting legislation like Canada’s Online News Act and Australia’s News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code would be helpful. In Europe, the Digital Services Act is expected to restrain Big Tech and new cross border journalism initiatives will help stabilize financing for some publications.

Recent reform proposals in the US include the Local Journalism Sustainability Act of 2021, 2022 and 2023.  While the act has attracted bipartisan support, it remains in committee while larger antitrust issues get sorted out in US v GoogleUS v Apple,   issues with Microsoft, and US v Meta. 

Still, none of these legal initiatives seem likely to help a media system that everyone uses but many people hate.  Rebuilding trust, serving communities and sharing the power of the media will help more than all the AI – powered high-tech advances that can be churned out by the digital-industrial information complex.

Science & Information Revolutions

Happy Wayzgoose, everyone

Wayzgoose falls on August 24th each year, so let’s make the most of it. 

What’s Wayzgoose? You may well ask.

It’s the traditional holiday for printers,  typesetters, bookbinders, copy editors, journalists and all the ink stained wretches who wear garters on their sleeves and sit below the salt.

The centuries-old event  has largely been lost in the  21st century, but it was still very much alive a generation or two ago, especially among printing unions in the US and UK.

Wendell Berry has written extensively about farming as agriculture, with the accent on culture.  Similarly, printing was a living culture at the heart of European and American society, and worth remembering,  if only because its echoes can still be heard, faintly, in modern times, especially around Aug. 24.

The holiday has its origins in the feast day for St. Bartholomew, the patron saint of scribes and, later, of printers and writers.

The odd name for the holiday, Wayzgoose, refers to the centerpiece of this holiday meal: a goose that had been fattened on stubble (or wayz) from a harvested field of grain.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the Wayzgoose was

An entertainment given by a master-printer to his workmen ‘about Bartholomew-tide’ (24 August), marking the beginning of the season of working by candle-light. In later use, an annual festivity held in summer by the employees of a printing establishment, consisting of a dinner and (usually) an excursion into the country.

The celebration would be held at the master printer’s home, or in later centuries, as part of an excursion into the country.

The Wayzgoose was often the occasion for the introduction of new apprentices, the promotion of older apprentices to journeymen, and speeches about the virtues of the profession.

A speech by the company’s owner or master printer might include a reminder  that printers had much in common with the monks who once laboriously copied books by hand.

He (or not infrequently, she) might tell them that the printing company was still called a chapel, the foreman
Continue reading

Franklin’s printing press

March is women’s history month

An exhibit at the Missouri Historical Society reminds us that women have had an important but often overlooked place in media history.  This photo from the exhibit shows the staff of the Miami Herald’s women’s pages in the 1950s.

The photo features many women who made important contributions to journalism. Dorothy Jurney is in the immediate foreground. Roberta Applegate is seated facing the camera against the far wall with her arm on her typewriter. Marie Anderson is at the center of the photograph seated at her desk with a pencil in her hand. Eleanor Ratelle is standing next to the filing cabinet in the back. [Jurney, Dorothy Misener (1909-2002), Papers, 1920-1992 (C3904)]

This is only the latest in a global effort to ensure more accurate and equal representation of women in all professions and walks of life.

Other articles and historical resources about women in journalism include:

Black history month 2023

Ida B. Wells

February is traditionally black history month, and it’s time to recall that one of the most  significant moments in the history of the American press involves the long, ongoing struggle for civil rights in the Black press and the resistance from  the White / mainstream press against civil rights, which only gradually changed in the post World War II era.

There are two stories. Part I is the story of the African American / Black press —  the  mainstay of the long movement for equality.  Part II is the story of  the White / mainstream press reluctantly awakening to its responsibilities.   

The Black press “was the signal corps,” wrote Margot Lee Shetterly, author of  Hidden Figures, “giving the watchword so that the negro community moved forward in synch with America.”    

Read more: “Civil Rights and the Press” here, at Revolutions in Communication.

A modern Pulitzer & a 19th century editor

The 2021 Pulitzer Prize for commentary and editorial writing, won by Richmond Times Dispatch columnist Michael Paul Williams,  begins by noting that there were objections to the massive statues of Robert E Lee and other Confederate heroes erected in the 1890s in the former capitol of the Confederacy.
Williams wrote:

The original opponent of the Robert E. Lee statue issued a stern prophesy after the monument was erected in 1890.  John Mitchell Jr. — newspaper editor, politician, banker and civil rights activist — predicted that the monument “will ultimately result in handing down to generations unborn a legacy of treason and blood.”  

John Mitchell, Jr., was editor of the Richmond Planet from 1884 – 1925.   A resident of Richmond, Va.’s  Jackson Ward area, Mitchell was born into slavery in 1863, but his family was freed when Union troops liberated the city in April 1865.

Beginning in December, 1884, Mitchell started reporting on injustice and lynchings. For example, he reported on a lynching in Smithville,  Charlotte county, Virginia in May, 1886. Afterwards, someone sent Mitchell a rope with a note attached to it, warning that he would also be lynched if he ever set foot in Smithville. He responded with a line from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar:

“There are no terrors, Cassius, in your threats, for I am so strong in honesty that they pass by me like the idle wind, which I respect not.”

Afterwards, armed with two Smith & Wesson pistols, Michell took a train to   Smithville and walked  five miles from the station to see the site of the hanging.

Continue reading

BBC’s WWII truth blitz

When BBC’s German language service began in 1938, the policy that seemed to hold the most promise was to tell the unvarnished truth, according to research reported in the Guardian recently.

In practice, telling the truth would mean that British defeats in battle would be reported accurately throughout the war, without exaggeration,  says Dr Vike Martina Plock of the department of English at Exeter University.

Plock discovered BBC memos at the archive center in Caversham Park, Reading.  “It is fascinating to see how the BBC provided the German public with accurate information during the war and thereby began to re-educate individuals who had been living, willingly or unwillingly, with 12 years of Nazi propaganda,” she told the Guardian. Continue reading

A mysterious photo

Mysterious Ukrainian newspaper photo c. 1925

This mysterious propaganda photo was taken in the Ukraine during the early period of Soviet control, probably around 1925.  The photo was collected in WWII by the Farm Security Administration and was found at the Library of Congress.

The photo raises questions. Would journalists really set type on the back of a truck in the middle of a wheat field?  Was it staged, or faked, or part of a serious effort to get journalists close to the people? Do the shadows in the truck line  up with the shadows on the field? Were two photos cut in together?

Continue reading