Fact checking Holocaust disinformation

This is an example of just how far right-wing disinformation will go. According to the narration in this video:  “The Holocaust stuff was about them (the New York Times)  not wanting to be seen as a Jewish-owned  newspaper, because this was America in the 1940s, there was a lot of antisemitism. They were afraid it would jeopardize their position in the market, and for them, that was just something they would not sacrifice, even for the truth. They actually forbade the word “Jew” in their news reports during that period.”  

That seemed pretty far fetched on the face of it, so we fact-checked the claim that the word “Jew” could not show up in the New York Times. Using the full text ProQuest database to search of the Times for the words  “Jews or Jewish” in the date range 1933 – 1946, we found 95,085 articles over 5114 days (14 years), for an average of  18.6  articles mentioning Jews or Jewish people  per day.

There are over 3,500 articles with the term “concentration camp,” and of those, over 750 also have the words “Jews or Jewish.”

The Prager U media “expert” also says that the New York Times w0n Pulitzer prizes during World War II for pro-Nazi coverage.  Checking the roster of Pulitzers from 1942 through 1946, there are no prizes for the Times coverage of the European war. There are two for  Pacific war coverage, and one in 1941 for general coverage of the emerging war. There are none for anything remotely resembling “pro-Nazi” coverage.

This Prager video fits with the right-wing canard that political progressives in the US are antisemitic, but unfortunately, it doesn’t fit the facts.

As an interesting side – note:  The New York Times did win a Pulitzer Prize for Public Service in 1944 in honor of its April 4, 1943 survey about understanding of US history.   We wonder how well the Prager staff would fare on that kind of history test.

Also See: 
American Public Opinion and the Holocaust (Gallup polls)

Franklin museum demonstrates printing press

Franklin’s printing press

March is women’s history month

An exhibit at the Missouri Historical Society reminds us that women have had an important but often overlooked place in media history.  This photo from the exhibit shows the staff of the Miami Herald’s women’s pages in the 1950s.

The photo features many women who made important contributions to journalism. Dorothy Jurney is in the immediate foreground. Roberta Applegate is seated facing the camera against the far wall with her arm on her typewriter. Marie Anderson is at the center of the photograph seated at her desk with a pencil in her hand. Eleanor Ratelle is standing next to the filing cabinet in the back. [Jurney, Dorothy Misener (1909-2002), Papers, 1920-1992 (C3904)]

This is only the latest in a global effort to ensure more accurate and equal representation of women in all professions and walks of life.

Other articles and historical resources about women in journalism include:

Black history month 2023

Ida B. Wells

February is traditionally black history month, and it’s time to recall that one of the most  significant moments in the history of the American press involves the long, ongoing struggle for civil rights in the Black press and the resistance from  the White / mainstream press against civil rights, which only gradually changed in the post World War II era.

There are two stories. Part I is the story of the African American / Black press —  the  mainstay of the long movement for equality.  Part II is the story of  the White / mainstream press reluctantly awakening to its responsibilities.   

The Black press “was the signal corps,” wrote Margot Lee Shetterly, author of  Hidden Figures, “giving the watchword so that the negro community moved forward in synch with America.”    

Read more: “Civil Rights and the Press” here, at Revolutions in Communication.

‘Not the enemy’ says retiring Philly anchor

“Permit me a final word, if you would,” said Jim Gardner, retiring Philadelphia ABC affiliate news anchor, in his final address to the audience Dec. 21, 2022.

“The American free press has been under attack, not by forces from other countries, but from elements embedded in our own society, and even our own government. It worries me deeply.”

Gardner went on to quote Thomas Jefferson’s words to John Jay in 1786, “Our liberty can not be guarded but by the freedom of the press, nor that be limited without danger of losing it.”

“We are not the enemy of the people. Serving the people, you the people of the tri-state area, with responsible and unbiased journalism. This is our mission now and in the future. And if we falter, you damn well better let us know, for your benefit and for ours.”

Happy animated Halloween

 

 

A history of social media

By Kristi Hines, Sept. 2, 2022
SEARCH ENGINE JOURNAL 

Randy Suess and Ward Christensen introduced the Computerized Hobbyists Bulletin Board System in 1978.

While initially designed to help the inventors network with fellow members of a computer club in Chicago and generate content for their club’s newsletter, it eventually grew to support 300-600 users.

CBBS still exists today as a forum with posts dating back to 2000.

As modems increased speed, bulletin board systems became more popular with computer users. Using the telnet BBS Guide, you can travel back in time and see over 1,000 bulletin board systems.

MORE

Honoring a Black editor

The Richmond Mercury
Feb 15, 2022 

A new license plate could be added this summer to the more than 250 options Virginians can choose from if the House of Delegates passes and the governor signs a bill to introduce the design commemorating a newspaper founded by emancipated men.

The bill to create a license plate in honor of the Richmond Planet passed the Senate unanimously last week. Sen. Joe Morrissey, D-Richmond, introduced the bill on Jan. 21 with Sen. Jennifer McClellan, D-Richmond, as a cosponsor. However, the effort to increase awareness of the history of the pioneering Black newspaper started last year when Tappahannock native Reginald Carter started gathering the 450 preorders needed to kickstart the process before the General Assembly’s session began.

“It was definitely a sigh of relief,” Carter said of his reaction to the bill passing the Senate. “You know, sad that we’re not done, but this is a major step in the process that has been achieved.”

The Richmond Planet caught Carter’s attention while he conducted research with a Tappahanock genealogy society to tell the story of a lynching that took place in the area on March 23, 1896. That’s when he encountered articles by John Mitchell Jr., the editor and publisher of the newspaper who had been born into slavery and became an advocate for civil rights in Richmond and elsewhere in Virginia.  Continue reading

Holding social media accountable

The Conversation asked three experts on social media, technology policy and global business to offer one specific action the government could take about Meta’s Facebook service.

LET USERS CONTROL THEIR DATA 

Anjana Susarla, Professor of Information Systems, Michigan State University

Social media sites like Facebook are designed for constant interaction to engage users’ attention. To rein in Facebook, lawmakers must first understand the harm that results from algorithmic manipulation on these platforms. One thing Congress could do is make sure Facebook gives users more control over what data the company collects about them and why.

Most people who use Facebook are unaware of how algorithmic recommendations affect their experience of the platform and thereby the information they engage with. For example, political campaigns have reportedly tried to manipulate engagement to get more traction on Facebook.

A key aspect of providing such transparency is giving users greater access to and control over their data, similar to what’s proposed in California’s Consumer Privacy Act. This would allow users to see what personal data Facebook collects about them and how the company uses it. Many people don’t realize that Meta has the ability to make inferences about their political preferences and attitudes toward society.

A related issue is data portability tools and rights that allow users to take the data, including photos and videos, that they shared on Facebook to other social media services. Continue reading