Centennial of radio’s first election

From the roof of the nine story Westinghouse K Building at the East Pittsburgh Works, radio station KDKA first covered the 1920 presidential  election a century ago. Westinghouse publicity claimed the election night broadcast was “a national sensation,” but that is only part of the story.   In fact, three other embryonic ratio stations were also broadcasting the election results that night —  the Detroit News’ “Radiophone” service, a temporary Saint Louis Post-Dispatch radio station, and the Buffalo Evening News broadcast through an affiliated with an amateur station.

The fact that KDKA is best remembered is probably because the station was a leader in radio technology with pioneering engineer Frank Conrad and also that the content of the broadcast was better organized with the help of Duquense University. About 1,000 people heard the election results in Pittsburg, thanks to Conrad’s suffragette wife, Flora, who helped organize listening parties. Flora had something to celebrate that night too. It was the first national election where women could vote.

The best editorial of the 20th century

Eugene Patterson was an editor for the Atlanta Journal and Constitution when he wrote this editorial of Sept. 16, 1963, a day after the notorious 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, which killed four children. The editorial is a classic in American journalism and probably the best of the 20th century.  

“A Negro mother wept in the street Sunday morning in front of a Baptist Church in Birmingham. In her hand she held a shoe, one shoe, from the foot of her dead child. We hold that shoe with her.

Every one of us in the white South holds that small shoe in his hand.

It is too late to blame the sick criminals who handled the dynamite. The FBI and the police can deal with that kind. The charge against them is simple. They killed four children.

Only we can trace the truth, Southerner — you and I. We broke those children’s bodies.

We watched the stage set without staying it. We listened to the prologue unbestirred. We saw the curtain opening with disinterest. We have heard the play.

We — who go on electing politicians who heat the kettles of hate.

We — who raise no hand to silence the mean and little men who have their nigger jokes.

We — who stand aside in imagined rectitude and let the mad dogs that run in every society slide their leashes from our hand, and spring.

We — the heirs of a proud South, who protest its worth and demand it recognition — we are the ones who have ducked the difficult, skirted the uncomfortable, caviled at the challenge, resented the necessary, rationalized the unacceptable, and created the day surely when these children would die.

This is no time to load our anguish onto the murderous scapegoat who set the cap in dynamite of our own manufacture.

He didn’t know any better.

Continue reading

Changing up the look of news

Judy Woodruff of PBS News Hour now anchors the show from home.

The visual design of television news is becoming less busy, says Hunter Schwarz in an article in  Eye on Design as the coronavirus has shifted us into new ground.

“Guests no longer speak to us in front of in-studio green screens with professional makeup and lighting, but are instead beamed in from home offices on laptop cameras.

Walter Cronkite, radio news anchor, made the switch to TV news in the 1940s, before green screens and chyrons.

Historically, the busy visual design with fast moving graphics has only been with us a few decades.  In the early years, Schwarz says,  TV news wasn’t much to look at.    “The guys who started off in the television news business were radio guys,” said Bill Kovarik, a professor at Radford University and author of Revolutions in Communication. “There were not a lot of visual artists to start out with.”

 

A laughable attempt to muzzle the press

The last time a sitting president sued a newspaper for libel, laughter broke out on the floor of the US Senate as a clerk read the news.

That was December 15, 1908, and the president was Teddy Roosevelt. He was said to be  “furious” that the New York World  newspaper linked him to corruption over the Panama Canal. Teddy ordered federal attorneys to file criminal libel suits against newspapers carrying the story all over the country. Democrats considered it to be outrageous, and one US attorney resigned in protest rather than prosecute for libel.

New York World publisher Joseph Pulitzer said in response:  “He cannot muzzle the World.”  (See Pulitzer’s Reply Dec. 16, 1908)

Roosevelt’s lawsuit,  US v Press Publishing,  is today considered the “last gasp” of seditious libel. The US Supreme Court ruling  in 1911 was only two pages, and it didn’t even bother to touch on the merits of the case. Instead, the court simply sustained an objection by the newspaper that “the court has no jurisdiction in this case, because there is no statute of the United States authorizing the prosecution.”

The case was thought to be a First Amendment landmark at the time, but it is barely remembered in communications law textbooks today.  After all, what sitting president would lower himself to file such a suit?  Even outright allegations of murder did not tempt President Bill Clinton to wield that cudgel against critics like Jerry Falwell. What president would be so foolish as to sue for libel just because a newspaper published a disagreeable opinion?

Which brings us to Donald Trump, who sued the New York Times  on Feb. 26, 2020, and the Washington Post, on March  3, 2020, for daring to publish an apparently disagreeable opinion about Trump’s relationship with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. In the suit, Trump claimed that the Times knowingly published the supposedly false charge that there was a “quid pro quo” with the Russians in return for  their help in the 2016 election.  (The plaintiff’s petition can be read here.) 

This “quid pro quo” was described in  an op-ed written by former New York Times editor Max Frankel and published March 27, 2019.  In the op-ed, Frankel rejected  small concerns about “collusion” with Russia in the Trump campaign. The much larger issue, he said, involved the relationship between Trump and Putin.

Continue reading

Did the 2010s prove McLuhan’s determinism?

Nausea at the Newseum

(Now that the Newseum is closing down in Washington DC, We’ve dusted off an old column to remember its heroic glory and add to the accolades both pro and con).

“We got the bubble-headed-bleach-blonde who comes on at five,
She can tell you bout the plane crash with a gleam in her eye
It’s interesting when people die, we love dirty laundry …”
— Don Henley

If you want to meet that bubble-head, just drop a Jackson and visit the shiny new Newseum on the Mall in Washington DC. She’s there in her natural element, enshrined in a vast warehouse of media fantasies, in a vacuum so complete that even a news chopper hanging from the ceiling virtually vanishes into irrelevance.

It’s not just the unbelievable architecture that gives you vertigo. The enormous empty space is a perfect reflection of the modern profession: Beautiful exteriors, vacuous interiors. A $450 million monument to a profession that is devouring its young.

It’s a saccharine sepulcher of the supine press. A tomb, not a monument. Or, as Steven Colbert said, a “Newsoleum.”

Wait. Are we being unfair? Gosh! Gee! Whiz! What’s not to like about the press? Even Superman commits journalism. Kent Brockman … Clark Kent … Dan Rather …. whats the diff? And why shouldn’t Fox “News” owner Rupert Murdoch have more or less the same place in the history of the news media as Joseph Pulitzer?

Continue reading

End of the Chicago Defender

linotypes at the Chicago Defender

Setting type at the Chicago Defender, 1941.

Resistance to injustice, bearing witness to the suffering of the innocent,  never  lacking sympathy for the poor — these have always been among the  sacred duties of the press, and no newspaper has  performed  with more courage and intelligence than the Chicago Defender.

The announcement that the news organization will stop printing its 114-year old print edition, and switch to online-only publication, is not unusual in the news business these days, but it does mark the passing of an era and a moment for reflection on the status of the African American press.

When over 100 African Americans were killed and thousands of homes burned during in the East St. Louis riots in July, 1917,  only the African American press, especially the Chicago Defender, covered the eyewitness accounts of brutality by white mobs.  The same is true of many other major riots and incidents. Continue reading

The first universal library

Scholars were astonished this year when the Libro de los Epítomes — a handwritten catalog of an early 16th century library — surfaced in a Danish library. The 2,000 page book was written by Ferdinand Columbus, the son of famed explorer Christopher Columbus, and scholars he hired. It was a catalog of a “universal library” collected in the early decades of the 1500s and located in Seville, Spain. The library apparently had 15,000 to 20,000 books, of which only a fraction have survived.

Apparently Columbus was interested in all kinds of literature, including not only the well known religious documents of the era and the usual Greek and Roman classics, but also newspapers, handbills, contemporary poetry and newly written books, many of which are unknown today.

It was an attempt, as one US National Public Radio story noted, “to circumnavigate the world of knowledge.” According to Edward Wilson-Lee, author of The Catalogue of Shipwrecked Books:

“The major question about the library which this book will help us to answer is how the exponentially rising amount of information during the age of print changed the way people organize knowledge about the world. … This will just get us that much closer to seeing how all of this information that wouldn’t have circulated publicly before changed his ways of thinking about the world.

Saudi murder of journalist is depravity

Jamal Kashoggi, an exiled Saudi Arabian journalist, is murdered during a visit to the Saudi embassy in Istanbul, Turkey, on Oct. 2, 2018, on orders from Saudi despot Mohammed Bin Salman. The murder should be investigated, a UN special commission said in June, 2019.

Joel Simon, director of the Committee to Protect Journalists, wrote:

Journalists over the past two decades have encountered some terrible fates. American reporters Daniel Pearl, James Foley and Steven Sotloff were abducted and beheaded by Islamist terrorists. Investigative reporters Anna Politkovskaya from Russia, Javier Valdez from Mexico and Daphne Caruana Galizia from Malta were all victims of targeted assassination.

But if what is alleged about the disappearance on Oct. 2 of Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi is true — that he was lured into the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, then murdered and dismembered by a team dispatched by the Saudi royal court — it would be in a category of depravity all its own.

What makes Khashoggi’s alleged murder so chilling is its sheer brazenness. 

Continue reading

Fembots & gendered communication

Meet Lilmiquela and the other “fembots” of the web.   Amanda Hess and Shane O’Neill of the New York Time Aug. 10, 2018 video show how fembots track along with social anxieties — from women’s suffrage to the housewives revolt to the current wave of feminists.  Social media fembots play on the anxiety that,  somehow,  women are fake.