{"id":3766,"date":"2020-12-28T15:28:21","date_gmt":"2020-12-28T15:28:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/?page_id=3766"},"modified":"2026-04-15T15:36:53","modified_gmt":"2026-04-15T15:36:53","slug":"section4quiz","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/section4quiz\/","title":{"rendered":"5.Q Section 5 quiz"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><span style=\"color: #993300;\">Section V\u00a0 <b>Libel\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #444444;\">\u00a0What is libel? Is it different from slander?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #444444;\">\u00a0What are the three main defenses against a libel suit?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>What are the five elements of libel that must be present if a plaintiff is to win a libel suit?<\/p>\n<p>Legally and ethically, what should you do if your publication or broadcast has made a\u00a0 mistake?<\/p>\n<p>Can you libel the dead? Why or why not?<\/p>\n<p>What is the statute of limitations on libel and privacy suits?<\/p>\n<p>What unanimous Supreme Court decision\u00a0 1)\u00a0 protected freedom of speech and press; 2) protected political advertising; 3) established the doctrine of actual malice; and 4) made it difficult for public officials to win libel suits against critics?\u00a0 This is the court&#8217;s most important libel decision.<\/p>\n<p>What is reckless disregard? (1)\u00a0 The Saturday Evening Post story \u201cFootball Fix&#8221; led to a libel case in which failure to check facts was seen as malice (reckless disregard for the truth) because the reporters did not verify the allegations.<\/p>\n<p>What is reckless disregard? (2) The court said that mistakes in reporting news about public figures are not reckless if there is no time to check facts. This is the &#8220;hot news&#8221; case.<\/p>\n<p>Who is a public figure in a libel case? Courts said it usually had to be someone who voluntarily put themselves into the center of a public issue. The plaintiff was a lawyer who\u00a0 represented a family suing the Chicago police.\u00a0 This was enough for a right-wing group to claim the lawyer was a communist, even though that was not true.\u00a0 The question was whether the right-wing group&#8217;s claims should be judged under the actual malice standard or the negligence standard.\u00a0 The courts said he was not a public figure because he did not put himself forward to the public. What case is this from?<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #444444;\">It&#8217;s not libelous to say that a singing group sounds like the wailing of damned souls.\u00a0 \u00a0What early &#8220;fair comment and criticism&#8221; case is this from?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Libel history:\u00a0A long court fight between a cereal manufacturer and a magazine publisher ended in a draw. The publisher had accused the cereal maker of endangering the public with his (false) ideas that eating Grape Nuts will cure appendicitis<\/p>\n<p>Libel history:\u00a0 President Teddy Roosevelt sues Joseph Pulitzer over allegations of bribery in building the Panama Canal.<\/p>\n<p>Libel history:\u00a0 A car manufacturer sued a Chicago newspaper for libel after saying that Ford&#8217;s patriotism was flimsy.<\/p>\n<p>Libel history:\u00a0 TV talk show did not libel\u00a0 Texas beef under the Sullivan actual malice standard in a 1998 federal court decision<\/p>\n<p>Libel history:\u00a0 Court said a US senator&#8217;s press releases are not privileged<\/p>\n<p>Libel history:\u00a0 &#8220;Intentional infliction of emotional distress&#8221; is not an appropriate standard for cases involving defamation of public figures, the court said in what case?<\/p>\n<p>Libel history:\u00a0 A story by an Atlanta columnist quoting a prominent scientist about his theories of racial inferiority was libelous, according a judge, but the jury awarded only one dollar.<\/p>\n<p>Recent libel cases:\u00a0 A British group said McDonalds food was bad for health, bad for rain forests. They lost the libel suit but won on appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.<\/p>\n<p>Recent libel cases:\u00a0 If a company is &#8220;private,&#8221; and is still doing public business, a lawsuit against critics will be judged under the Sullivan standard.<\/p>\n<p>Recent libel cases: Is comparing a climate scientist to a child molester within the boundaries of fair comment and criticism, or is it an allegation of fact disguised as opinion?n<\/p>\n<p>Recent libel cases:\u00a0 A list of \u201cdirtiest hotels\u201d was not libelous but is clearly unverifiable rhetorical hyperbole,&#8221; and that a reasonable person &#8220;would not confuse a ranking system, which uses consumer reviews as its litmus, for an objective assertion of fact<\/p>\n<p>Recent libel cases:\u00a0 Toys R Us guard filmed while being arrested, sued TV. Court found TV did nothing wrong but did not dismiss on preliminary motion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Section V\u00a0 Libel\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0What is libel? Is it different from slander? \u00a0What are the three main defenses against a libel suit? What are the five elements of libel that must be present if a plaintiff is to win a libel &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/section4quiz\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"full-width-page.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3766","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3766"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3766\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7485,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3766\/revisions\/7485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}