{"id":28,"date":"2015-06-01T17:52:54","date_gmt":"2015-06-01T17:52:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/?page_id=28"},"modified":"2022-09-06T12:40:24","modified_gmt":"2022-09-06T12:40:24","slug":"constitution","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/constitution\/","title":{"rendered":"ORIGINS OF THE US CONSTITUTION"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"USConstitution.sm\"<\/a>The US Constitution<\/strong> and its guarantees of free religion, speech, press, assembly and petition were influenced by the long European\u00a0 history of religious warfare, the ideas of Enlightenment philosophers, the Virginia Declaration of Rights<\/a> of 1776.\u00a0 Another major influence,\u00a0 according to some scholars<\/a> , and a proclamation of Congress<\/a>,\u00a0 was the federalist state and national structure of the Iroquois Confederacy<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

I. Virginia Declaration of Rights 1776\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The very first legal hurdle in creating a system allowing free speech was taking away the government\u2019s power of prior restraint \u2014 interference with publications or speeches before they reach the public.\u00a0\u00a0 Although prior restraint censorship ended in 1694 in Britain, post-publication prosecutions for sedition and libel were common.\u00a0 Legal theory in the new American republic held that people should be free to publish whatever they liked, as we see in the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776 which was the basis for the US Bill of Rights.<\/p>\n

Article I :<\/strong> That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.<\/em><\/p>\n

Article 12:<\/strong> That the freedoms of speech and of the press are among the great bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained except by despotic governments. That any citizen may freely speak, write, and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right; that the General Assembly shall not pass any law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, nor the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the redress of grievances.<\/em><\/p>\n

A month later, in Philadelphia, the Declaration of Independence<\/strong> was signed:\u00a0 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.<\/em><\/p>\n

The rights embedded in the Virginia Constitution were not specifically spelled out in the Declaration of Independence.\u00a0 Nor were they enumerated in the 1777\u00a0 Articles of Confederation<\/a> which established a provisional government during and shortly after the American Revolution.<\/p>\n

\n

II. Freedom of religion, separation of Church and State\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In 1786, Virginia’s General Assembly debated and passed An Act for Establishing Religious Freedom<\/a>.<\/strong>\u00a0 The key issue was to separate the Virginia government from its official church, which was the Church of England. Taxes subsidized the church until that time. \u00a0However, the idea was not just a financial separation but also a removal of the state’s endorsement of a particular denomination.<\/p>\n

Largely written by Jefferson, and maneuvered through the General Assembly by James Madison, the Act made it clear that the government would not in future be allowed to make crucial religious decisions for the people. \u00a0The critical passage reads:<\/p>\n

\u201cWhereas Almighty God hath created the mind free; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments \u2026 tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of (* text not inserted *<\/span> <\/strong>) the Holy author of our religion, who being Lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as it was in his Almighty power to do; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others \u2026 Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, That no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burdened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and that the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.<\/em><\/p>\n

Thomas Jefferson<\/strong> had this to say about the *text not inserted*<\/strong><\/span> :<\/p>\n

* Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting \u2018Jesus Christ,\u2019 so that it would read \u2018A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;\u2019 the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination.\u00a0<\/span><\/em> \u2014 Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography<\/p>\n

Similarly, James Madison led the opposition to a bill establishing\u00a0 \u201cA Provision for Teachers of the Christian Religion. \u201cIf finally armed with the sanctions of a law, will be a dangerous abuse of power,\u201d he said\u00a0 in Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments.\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Another aspect of this church-state controversy is Jefferson’s intent in compiling a version of the Bible that edited out miraculous and superstitious content, leaving only Christian teachings.\u00a0 This “Jefferson Bible<\/a>” was published by an act of Congress in 1904<\/a>. Some Christian groups reject the idea that Jefferson was a Deist or that the Founders of the US Constitution did not wish to construe the US as a “Christian nation<\/a>.”<\/p>\n

\n

III. The US Constitution, 1787\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Because the many defects in the Articles of Confederation, a group of representatives from the states met in Philadelphia starting in 1786 to draft a constitution for a stronger central government. \u00a0Just just how strong, and how power would be distributed, was as controversial then as it is now. \u00a0But they hammered out a proposal in a form that is familiar today: \u00a0A three-part government (executive, legislative, judicial) with federal supremacy over states, and a 2\/3 majority in Congress to amend the constitution (with a state ratification process), and many other familiar features.<\/p>\n

Advocates of states rights, such as Thomas Jefferson, preferred a weak federal government.\u00a0 Alexander Hamilton and others preferred a strong federal government and argued for the Constitution’s ratification in a series of 85 essays called the Federalist Papers.<\/p>\n

One major flaw was that the original Constitution did not guarantee personal rights.\u00a0 Hamilton argued that there was no need to do so, since any power not specifically given to the government would be a power it could not exercise.\u00a0 A compromise was reached<\/a> where a bill of rights would be added to the Constitution to make it more acceptable to the advocates of states rights.<\/p>\n

\n

IV. The Bill of Rights 1791\u00a0<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Originally,<\/strong> James Madison and a committee proposed 12 amendments to the US Constitution as a Bill of Rights, with the first three involving freedom of religion, press, speech, petition and assembly:<\/p>\n

1) The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal flights of conscience be in any manner or on any pretext infringed;<\/em><\/p>\n

2) The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write or to publish their sentiments, and freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable;<\/em><\/p>\n

3) The people shall not be retrained from peaceably assembling and consulting for their common good; nor from applying to the legislature by petitions or remonstrances for redress of their grievances.<\/em><\/p>\n

These were eventually compressed into one First Amendment:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US Constitution and its guarantees of free religion, speech, press, assembly and petition were influenced by the long European\u00a0 history of religious warfare, the ideas of Enlightenment philosophers, the Virginia Declaration of Rights of 1776.\u00a0 Another major influence,\u00a0 according … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":8,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"full-width-page.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-28","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5338,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28\/revisions\/5338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}