{"id":25,"date":"2015-12-25T16:59:54","date_gmt":"2015-12-25T16:59:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/?page_id=25"},"modified":"2023-01-17T13:24:50","modified_gmt":"2023-01-17T13:24:50","slug":"science-writing","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/science-writing\/","title":{"rendered":"The story of the millennia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Nothing could be more important<\/strong> than the long-term survival of the peoples and ecosystems of planet earth; today, both are under threat as never before. And yet public support for environmental protection has dropped rapidly since the 1990s, when environment was once recognized as a bipartisan issue. \u00a0Today, in the cacophony of endless amusement and popular culture, the majority of Americans are asleep to the reasonable and often urgent calls to action by environmental scientists.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The sleep of reason produces monsters,<\/strong> as\u00a0Francisco Goya once said. \u00a0A country built on science, technology and engineering cannot suddenly abandon the foundations of its existence without severe consequences. \u00a0 Similarly, a country built on political dialogue cannot abandon its\u00a0past if it is inconvenient or politically threatening to a few business interests.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The sleep of history produces monstrous myths.<\/strong> Among these myths we find the idea that environmental controversy is new\u00a0and\u00a0that it is loaded with unfair political prejudices. \u00a0Another myth is that\u00a0people who\u00a0abandon\u00a0science will still be able to leave a legacy of freedom for their children.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h4><strong>State and regional green resources.\u00a0<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/vcnva.org\/\">Virginia Conservation Network\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.southernenvironment.org\/\">Southern Environmental Law Center<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/appalachianvoices.org\">Appalachian Voices\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>Journalists Resources<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sej.org\">The Society of Environmental Journalists\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.spj.org\">The Society of Professional Journalists \u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nasw.org\">National Association of Science Writers\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/casw.org\/casw\/who-are-science-writers\">Council for the Advancement of Science Writing\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>Highly recommended \u2026.<\/strong><\/h4>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=LHew7MqP4UM&amp;t=51s\">How to read science news<\/a> &#8211; video by Joe Hanson<\/li>\n<li>Virginian Pilot series on &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/kingtide.whro.org\/\">King Tides<\/a>&#8221; is<a href=\"https:\/\/www.poynter.org\/tech-tools\/2017\/four-newsrooms-350-volunteers-ready-to-engage-virginians-on-seas-rise\"> described by Poynter\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/fromthesource.org\/2020\/08\/12\/virtual-discussion-how-to-cover-a-watershed-as-a-beat\/?fbclid=IwAR1MqMxp_JlEZnwgHzYG9ALsTBYx2BrwYogp8oiEAx0_--9kIsc__XVRQ9A\">How to cover a watershed<\/a> &#8211; Rona Kobel<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sej.org\/initiatives\/climate-change\/overview\"><strong>SEJ Climate Backgrounder<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0\u2014 Society of Environmental Journalists guide to climate change information and disinformation.<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3680541-Climate101.html\">Climate 101\u00a0<\/a><\/strong>\u2014 Former New York Times reporter Andrew C. Revkin\u2019s 2015 climate briefing paper drawing from major reports. Excellent overview.<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.com\/all\/google-hangout-the-disastrous-effects\">\u00a0MSNBC \u00a0Climate Change report<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0from 2013, on Google Hangout.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/\"><strong>Real Climate<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0\u2014 Technical site for real climate scientists.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hurricane Harvey<\/strong>, EPA and Toxic Waste &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.star-telegram.com\/news\/nation-world\/national\/article170980227.html\">AP story Sept. 2, 2017<\/a> &#8212; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/newsreleases\/epa-response-aps-misleading-story\">EPA attack Sept 3 <\/a>\u00a0&#8212; \u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/mobile.twitter.com\/mbieseck\/status\/904492647250841600\">AP response Sept 4 <\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2016\/dec\/23\/john-vidal-environment-editor-greatest-job-on-earth?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet\">Teargas, trees and oil: My life in the greatest job on earth<\/a>, John Vidal, Guardian, Dec. 23, 2016<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/guest-blog\/dan-rather-now-more-than-ever-we-must-stand-up-for-science\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Now, more than ever, we must stand up for science,<\/a> Dan Rather, Scientific American, Nov. 14, 2016.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.environmentalhealthnews.org\/ehs\/news\/2016\/sept\/environmental-reporting-analysis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Environmental journalism reaches middle age, with mixed results,<\/a> Peter Dykstra, Daily Climate, Oct 2, 2016.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Star Talk:<\/strong>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.startalkradio.net\/show\/reporting-on-science-part-1\/#i\">\u00a0Niel Degrasse Tyson interviews Miles O\u2019Brien<\/a>, \u00a0May 11, 2014. \u00a0Climate change is the big topic.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Alda speaks:\u00a0<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aaas.org\/news\/alan-alda-good-communication-can-keep-scientists-and-public-committed-relationship\">Good communication <\/a>can keep scientists and the public in a committed relationship.<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.skepticalscience.com\/Debunking-Handbook-now-freely-available-download.html\">Debunking handbook: <\/a><\/strong>About the social science side of scientific controversy<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/blog\/2015\/06\/04\/newsweek-wash-times-publish-false-headlines-abo\/203890\">False headlines about EPA fracking study<\/a>,<\/strong> Media Matters, June 4, 2015<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.custojusto.pt\/braga\/livros\/sobre-a-terra-ricardo-garcia-16252226\">Sobre a Terra,<\/a> a Portuguese language book about environmental journalism, by\u00a0Ricardo Garcia.<\/li>\n<li>\n<p id=\"afbc\" class=\"graf--h3 graf-after--figure graf--title\"><strong class=\"markup--strong markup--h3-strong\"><a href=\"https:\/\/the-macroscope.org\/science-communication-as-a-moral-imperative-14188eb7d797#.84s25i7ru\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Science Communication as a Moral Imperative<\/a> <\/strong>&#8212; By Jonathan Foley, Aug 5, 2016 &#8212; \u00a0\u00a0<em class=\"markup--em markup--p-em\">While things are improving, we need to do a much better job of encouraging scientists to be stronger communicators, and share the wonders of science, and the important results of their research, to the broader world. To do less is a moral failure of science and academia.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong>How to write, what to avoid<\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The seven warning signs of Voodoo Science\u00a0<\/strong>By Robert L. Park (2002)\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.utah.edu\/~detar\/phys4910\/readings\/misconduct\/Park_SevenSigns.htm\">Seven distinct<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.utah.edu\/~detar\/phys4910\/readings\/misconduct\/Park_SevenSigns.htm\">warning signs \u2026 were identified:<\/a>\u00a01. A discovery is pitched directly to the media\u2026 2. A powerful establishment is said to be suppressing the discovery \u2026 3. An effect is always at the very limit of detection\u2026<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.environmentalhistory.org\/billkovarik\/2014\/12\/06\/green-beat\/\">Soft soap sells fracking:<\/a><\/strong> How things go wrong on the green beat, Dec. 2014, Bill Kovarik.<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/grist.org\/climate-energy\/climate-change-and-environmental-journalism\/\">Environmental journalism is boring\u00a0<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0says \u00a0Grist Magazine\u2019s David Roberts. \u00a0\u00a0\u201c\u2019Creature\/area threatened by pollutant\/industry\u2019 is a story everyone\u2019s seen before a million times. They know what it says before they read it and so, with the exception of the small class of people who care intensely about nature\/creatures as such, they don\u2019t read it.\u201d \u00a0 Aug. 21, 2013.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Creepy critters in sensitive places:<\/strong>\u00a0What science writers will do to get your attention.\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/blogs\/krulwich\/2013\/03\/28\/175580837\/six-legged-critters-in-dicey-places-what-science-reporters-do-to-get-your-attent\">Robert Krulwich, National Public Radio<\/a>, March 28, 2013.<\/li>\n<li><strong>This is a news website article about a scientific paper,\u00a0<\/strong>Sept. 2010\u00a0<strong>\u2014\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/the-lay-scientist\/2010\/sep\/24\/1?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter\">In this paragraph I will state the main claim t<\/a>hat the research makes, making appropriate use of \u201cscare quotes\u201d to ensure that it\u2019s clear that I have no opinion about this research whatsoever\u2026 by Martin Robins<\/li>\n<li><strong>Five inconvenient Truths\u00a0<\/strong>By David Downs, Colombia Journalism Review (July 2008)\u00a0<strong>\u2014\u00a0<\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediachannel.org\/wordpress\/2008\/06\/26\/five-inconvenient-truths\/\">1) It Ain\u2019t Sports Writing:\u00a0<\/a>A reporter covering, say, baseball doesn\u2019t have to define a home run in every article, but a reporter covering climate almost always has to remind readers what greenhouse gases are\u2026<\/li>\n<li><strong>Writing narratives\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 The best discussion about the details of story writing comes from\u00a0Pulitzer-Prize winning author\u00a0\u00a0Jon Franklin, whose \u201cMrs. Kelly\u2019s Monster\u201d is available in various places <a href=\"http:\/\/niemanstoryboard.org\/stories\/line-by-line-mrs-kellys-monster-how-jon-franklin-wrote-a-classic\">with<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.manship2.lsu.edu\/class\/handouts\/franklin.htm\">without<\/a> Franklin\u2019s annotations.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.lukewallin.com\/cwriting.htm\">Conservation Writing<\/a> by Luke Wallin; See esp. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lukewallin.com\/environ.htm\">Five Kinds of Environmental Writing<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Also see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sej.org\/textbooks-and-syllabi\">SEJ textbook list\u00a0<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.openculture.com\/2015\/07\/kurt-vonnegut-maps-out-the-universal-shapes-of-our-favorite-stories.html\">Kurt Vonnegut talks about writing,<\/a> from an ancient video.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4><strong><em>Careers in science &amp; environment writing<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>I<strong> blame a rattlesnake\u00a0<\/strong>for my science writing career\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com\/2013\/12\/09\/the-science-and-art-of-science-writing\/?ref=opinion&amp;_r=0\">says Michelle Nijhuis<\/a>\u00a0as she blogs about writing for the New York Times \u201cDraft\u201d series. Dec. 9, 2013).<strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Science Journalism in Crisis<\/strong>\u00a0By The Euroscience Newsletter \u2013<a href=\"http:\/\/www.euroscience.org\/science-journalism-in-crisis-from-the-world-conference-of-science-journalis,29007,en.html\">\u00a0The downward trend (of coverage in the US and UK)\u00a0<\/a>was not reflected by Nadia El-Awady who had gathered data on science reporting in the Arab World and Africa. Seemingly in these regions the appetite for science stories is increasing. (Also linked to\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wcsj2009.org\/\">6th Conf Sci Journ<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Science journalism: Too close for comfort\u00a0<\/strong>\u2014 By Boyce Rensberger (Nature, June 25, 2009)\u2013\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v459\/n7250\/full\/4591055a.html\">Science journalism has undergone profound changes\u00a0<\/a>since its origin more than a century ago \u2026 If science journalists are to regain relevance to society, not only must they master the new media, they must learn enough science to analyse and interpret the findings\u2026<\/li>\n<li><strong>Science Journalism: Toppling the Priesthood<\/strong>\u00a0by Toby Murcott (Nature, June 25, 2009) \u2014\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v459\/n7250\/full\/4591054a.html\">(Political journalists) \u201care active participants in the process of knowledge creation<\/a>\u00a0in a way that science journalists cannot be, given the qualifications needed to act as an equal in scientific debate.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong>Science Journalism in Decline; Science Blogging Growing Fas<\/strong>t \u2014 By Geoff Brumfiel \u2014 (Nature, Mar 18 2009)\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2009\/090318\/full\/458274a.html\">John Timmer\u2019s slide into journalism was so gradual\u00a0<\/a>even he can\u2019t put his finger on the point at which he stopped being a researcher. He started reading Internet websites and message boards a decade ago, while he was working as a postdoc \u2026<\/li>\n<li><strong>Are Environmental Journalists an Endangered Species?<\/strong>\u00a0By Joel Mackower (Huffington Post, Dec. 18, 2008)\u2013 \u201c\u2026\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/joel-makower\/are-environmental-journal_b_151213.html\">Mainstream business writers still seem ill-informed and overly cynical\u00a0<\/a>about company efforts to be greener. Like the preponderance of their readers, editors and reporters seem to start with the assumption that most environmental activities undertaken by companies, especially large companies, are done primarily for P.R. reasons. True, healthy skepticism is the currency of a good journalist, but undying cynicism is more the norm when it comes to environmental business reporting.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Science and journalism fail to connect<\/strong>\u00a0By Dan Fagin (2005)<a href=\"http:\/\/www.templeton-cambridge.org\/fellows\/fagin\/publications\/2005.winter\/science_and_journalism_fail_to_connect\/\">\u00a0How can we expect Americans to know anything beyond what they happen to remember from science class?<\/a>\u00a0Journalists certainly don\u2019t tell them.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Disconnect of News Reporting From Scientific Evidence<\/strong>\u00a0by Max Boykoff (2005) \u2014\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nieman.harvard.edu\/reportsitem.aspx?id=100593\">By adhering to the notion of balance,\u00a0<\/a>(the news media) greatly amplified the views of a small group of contrarians who contest the notion that humans are contributing to changes in the climate.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Weight-of-Evidence Reporting: What Is It? Why Use It?<\/strong>\u00a0by Sharon Dunwoody (2005) \u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nieman.harvard.edu\/reportsitem.aspx?id=100595\">\u00a0If a reporter cannot determine what\u2019s true, what is she to do?\u00a0<\/a>The \u201cobjectivity norm\u201d responds that, if you cannot tell what\u2019s true, then at least capture truth claims accurately. Objective journalism effectively reproduces the views of its sources\u2026 A journalist can work to meet the high standards of accuracy set by the objectivity norm but might still mislead readers into thinking that a source\u2019s position on an issue is important and potentially true\u2026 I suggest another strategy that would permit journalists to retain their emphasis on objectivity and balance but still share with their audiences a sense of where \u201ctruth\u201d might lie, at least at that moment. I call this strategy \u201cweight-of-evidence\u201d reporting.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The end of science writing\u00a0<\/strong>By Jon Franklin (1997)\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.utah.edu\/~detar\/phys4910\/readings\/fundamentals\/franklin_endsci.htm\">If science was ever a thing apart, a special way of living and of seeing things, that time is past.\u00a0<\/a>Today, science is the vital principle of our civilization. To do science is critical, to defend it the kernel of political realism. To define it in words is to be, quite simply, a writer, working the historical mainstream of literature.<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/2013\/07\/28\/wild_might_take_place_outdoors_but_its_far_from_a_wilderness_memoir_partner\/\">Nature writing is over\u00a0<\/a><\/strong>\u2013 Jim Hinch, July 28, Salon, 2013.\u00a0Cheryl Strayed\u2019s \u201cEat, Pray, Love\u201d-style autobiography \u201cWild\u201d may have rung the genre\u2019s death knell<\/li>\n<li><strong>The health of science journalism<\/strong>\u00a0By Peter Osnos (The Century Foundation, 2007) Mass media of the sort that reaches the largest and most uncritical audiences is\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.tcf.org\/list.asp?type=NC&amp;pubid=1734\">spending vastly more energy on what sells than on what matters in a deeper sense.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Scientists as writers<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Top Ten Tips (to scientists) for Telling Your Story (to reporters)<\/strong>\u00a0By Mark Schleifstein\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.environmentalhistory.org\/billkovarik\/journalism\/about\/TenTips.to.Scientists.html\">Make sure your message is clear before the reporter leaves.\u00a0<\/a>Don\u2019t exclude facts or take short-cuts in your explanations, because they\u2019ll lead to errors in the story.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The revolution that didn\u2019t happen<\/strong>\u00a0By Stephen Weinberg (1998)<a href=\"http:\/\/www.physics.utah.edu\/~detar\/phys4910\/readings\/fundamentals\/weinberg.html\">\u00a0Kuhn did not deny that there is progress in science,\u00a0<\/a>but he denied that it is progress toward anything. He often used the metaphor of biological evolution: scientific progress for him was like evolution as described by Darwin, a process driven from behind, rather than pulled toward some fixed goal to which it grows ever closer.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Media as a Tool \u00a0for Communication on the Environment and Sustainability<\/strong>\u00a0By Michael Nitz\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.projekte.org\/millennium\/papers\/paper7\/index.html\">Since the media are the primary source for citizens\u2019 information about environmental issues, t<\/a>he paper first examines how the media cover the environment. Second, the chapter proposes a dualistic framework of framing and involvement theories as a way to explain the process of organizations\u2019 public communication in the environmental arena.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Environmentalists Narrative\u00a0<\/strong>ByStuart Schoenfeld (2004)\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sustreport.org\/resource\/shoenfeld.html#stuart\">Like any other social group, environmentalists have a shared story about who they are and how they came to be\u00a0<\/a>\u2026<\/li>\n<li><strong>Rental Trucks and Brain Surgeons: Why do humanities students need to study science? (PDF)\u00a0<\/strong>By Bruce Margon (2000)<a href=\"http:\/\/www.stsci.edu\/~margon\/policy.html\">\u00a0I see at least four major reasons: 1<\/a>. Qualification as a citizen\u2026 2. Detection of nonsense \u2026 3. Understanding certain absolutes\u2026 4. Beauty \u2026<\/li>\n<li><strong>Science and technology policymaking: A primer (PDF)\u00a0<\/strong>(Congressional Research Service)\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/sgp\/crs\/misc\/RL34454.pdf\">Science and engineering research and innovations are intricately linked to societal needs and the nation\u2019s economy<\/a>\u00a0in areas such as transportation, communication, agriculture, education, environment, health, defense, and jobs. As a result, policymakers are interested in almost every aspect of science and technology\u00a0 policy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>International environment writing<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Environmental Journalism Viewed from Canada<\/strong>, by Shane Gunster,\u00a0<em>Media Development<\/em>\u00a02:56, Spring 2009 (On reserve or to be distributed with permission) \u2014\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.environmentalhistory.org\/billkovarik\/journalism\/about\/#\">(By 2008 we could be optimistic about) \u2026 the sheer volume of stories\u00a0<\/a>(and) a noticeable shift in the tone and content of the coverage away from controversies over the legitimacy of climate science towards an acceptance of its anthropogenic basis, the likely severity of its effects and the pressing need to substantially reduce greenhouse gases\u2026. (But by 2009) \u2026 Eight months into the meltdown of financial markets and in the midst of a deepening global economic recession, the prospects for environmental journalism today in Canada appear much bleaker. Given the widespread and often catastrophic impact of the economic crisis, the rapid displacement of the environment by the economy in the headlines is entirely understandable. More troublesome, though, is the complete failure of the media to reflect upon the possibility that \u2018fixing\u2019 the crisis might involve something more creative than simply stimulating a return to unsustainable levels of consumption and economic growth. What about exploring a fundamentally different vision of what constitutes a healthy economy based upon criteria such as sustainability or the capacity to satisfy real human needs?<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nieman.harvard.edu\/reports\/article\/101411\/Environment-Reporting-in-China.aspx\">Environmental Journalism flourishing in China <\/a><\/strong>\u2014 Nieman Reports \u00a0 \u2014\u00a0In 1984, China Environment News was launched in Beijing. It is said that it was the only national newspaper specializing in environmental reporting in the world. At that time, environmental reporting was in its infancy and, in China, no other media outlets were reporting environmental news.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Covering specific issues<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Ten tips for Covering Biofuels\u00a0<\/strong>By Bill Kovarik (2007)\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.environmentalhistory.org\/billkovarik\/journalism\/about\/ten.tips.covering.biofuels.htm\"><strong>1. Seek the truth.<\/strong>\u00a0In biofuels as in many other scientific controversies, charges and counter-charges are often made by partisans.\u00a0\u00a0<\/a>As a journalist, your job is to get beyond the sound bites and to define and analyze the issues.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Science writer struggles to understand CAFO impacts<\/strong>, Oct., 2010 \u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theopennotebook.com\/2010\/10\/24\/dan-ferber-dairy-farm\/\">\u00a0I once heard someone say\u00a0<\/a>that the definition of a good story is: \u201cMain character falls into a hole and struggles to get out\u2026 \u201c<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hurrican Gustav and Mark Schleifstein\u00a0<\/strong>By Brian Stelter, New York Times, Aug 31, 2008\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/09\/01\/business\/media\/01paper.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=schleifstein&amp;st=cse&amp;oref=login\">The Times-Picayune in New Orleans is promoting the work of Mark Schleifstein,<\/a>\u00a0a 24-year veteran of the newspaper, with a forceful claim this week: He is, the paper asserts, \u201cthe man who predicted the flood.\u201d<\/li>\n<li><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/magazine\/archive\/2018\/09\/dinosaur-extinction-debate\/565769\/\">The Nastiest Feud in Science<\/a> <\/strong>by Bianca Bosker, The Atlantic,\u00a0 follows the history of the dinosaur extinction debate and the two sides &#8212; asteroid impact on the one hand, climate change on the other.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>New media and environmental reporting<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>A 2013<a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.com\/all\/google-hangout-the-disastrous-effects\"> MSNBC \u00a0Climate Change report<\/a> used Google Hangout. \u00a0 One environmental journalist asked: \u00a0why spend all that money on equipment to air a show that makes everyone look like the Shroud of \u00a0Turin?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nothing could be more important than the long-term survival of the peoples and ecosystems of planet earth; today, both are under threat as never before. And yet public support for environmental protection has dropped rapidly since the 1990s, when environment &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/science-writing\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"full-width-page.php","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-25","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1974,"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25\/revisions\/1974"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revolutionsincommunication.com\/journalism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}